"Analyzing Ads: Gender" was written by Angela Eward-Mangione, Emma Brown, and Susan Gail Taylor.
We need to be aware of how advertisers appeal to us, and we should think critically about the persuasive messages we encounter to ensure we are savvy, not passive, consumers. Because consumers purchase products with which they identify, it is important to examine the subtexts of advertisements as well as the role those subtexts play in determining what products men and women choose to associate with their personal identities. The subtexts of a visual argument are closely associated with both intended audience and meaning. For example, a simple message such as, “You should buy this product,” means nothing without a subtext to clarify who “you” is, particularly in relationship to the product. Is “you” a 21st-century American woman? A 20th-century American woman? An American woman of the 1930s is a very a different “you” than one of, for example, the 2010s. The power of subtexts should not be underestimated: they reflect and influence the ways that men and women think about themselves and the ways that subliminal messages function in advertising.
Consider the following 2011 Dr. Pepper "Not for Women" commercial:
This ad has generated much controversy because of its clearly delineated audience. Why might advertisers restrict their audience to one gender? How is masculinity defined in this commercial? Also, see questions in the checklist below, and try to critically (not necessarily negatively, but thoughtfully) approach this ad.
That Susie Sunshine belongs in the home instead of the workplace and that Johnny Sunshine isn’t and could never be a homemaker are ideas based on stereotypes. Consider laundry detergent advertisements: men are rarely shown doing the laundry. In most laundry detergent commercials, a mother is depicted as the official domestic caretaker, who lovingly rids her family’s clothes of grass and food stains. For some families, this may be typical. However, there are issues of gender role expectations at play in such advertisements.
When analyzing an ad in terms of gender, it is certainly important to identify the ad's intended audience. It is equally important to consider the ad's publishing context. As definitions of femininity have evolved, commercials trying to sell products to women have changed—and the same goes for commercials advertising products for men. Consider the following sets of commercials: given what you know about the era in which each ad appeared, analyze the ad's depiction of and appeals to male and female consumers.
2010 Old Spice "Questions" commercial:
1971 Old Spice commercial:
2012 Secret Outlast commercial:
1950s Camay Deodorant Soap commercial:
Movement: Is there explicit action or movement in the ad? Implied action or movement?
Gaze: Are the models' eyes visible in the ad? If so, are they downcast? Looking out at the audience? Locked on another model? Focused on the product the ad is trying to sell? If they are not visible, are they obstructed or covered by the product? Or, is a model’s face cut out of the ad entirely?
Subtexts: What are the underlying arguments or assertions of the ad? That men should pursue women aggressively? That women should pursue men aggressively? That women should be passive? That women should be mothers? That men should be family-oriented? That men should work in the professional business world? Look for subtexts that both support and refute traditional gender stereotypes.
Written language: Is there text in the ad? If so, is the text informational? Does it directly relate to the product? Does it contain a slogan or catchphrase? Something else? What level of language is used? Slang? Jargon? Can it be interpreted in multiple ways?
While Writing Commons is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, derivative works of Writing Commons must include this note on all printed/displayed pages: "This is a derivative work of Writing Commons, http://writingcommons.org, a peer-reviewed, open-education resource. As a derivative, it may contain work that is not peer-reviewed or a part of Writing Commons."